In the editorial Neanderthals Are People Too the author, Svante
Paabo discusses the ethical dilemma of replicating a genetically accurate living
Neanderthal. He explains how, because scientists have sequenced a genome of a Neanderthal,
many scientists think we should create a living breathing Neanderthal for
scientific study. However, this presents many problems. Paabo uses his
grandfather as an example to argue his point. He explains how his grandfather
died long before he ever had the chance to meet him. He admits that he had
always wished he had been able to know him, but he would not want to replicate
a twin of his grandfather. Paabo believes it is the same with Neanderthals. He says
“In a civilized society, we would never create a human being in order to
satisfy scientific curiosity.” His point is: we wouldn’t make a human to poke
and prod at in the name of research why should the rules be any different for a
Neanderthal? They are our ancestors after all.
I agree with
Svante Paabo, it is not at all morally right to treat a cloned Neanderthal like
a lab rat. Even though this Neanderthal is a clone it is still a human and a
real person who has their own thoughts and feelings.
As well as
thoughts feelings this clone will have new experiences. When you are born you
do have a certain amount of inherited traits, but most of your lifestyle and personality
is developed through learning and experiences. To use Paabo’s grandfather as an
example, if you cloned a relative that has passed, they will start out with the
same traits that your relative started out with. However any part of the person’s
personality that was learned or developed will be absent. This new clone will
develop different traits because their childhood environment will be different
from that of your relative. The clone will not be exactly the same as your
relative, and – I’m no scientist—but I think this could possibly happen with a
cloned Neanderthal. This cloned Neanderthal will be living and growing in the
twenty first century, a drastically different environment than what original Neanderthals
experienced and that could impact how this Neanderthal lives and acts.
Paabo is
absolutely right when he says cloning a Neanderthal for lab work is not
ethical. It is unfair to the Neanderthal clone. Thankfully, some scientists
have thought of alternatives such as growing Neanderthal tissue and studying
that. It will be alive and observable, but it will be only a swatch of cells which
is a much less harmful alternative. I do believe that research such as this
will be useful to the future of science, but I also think we have to be careful
about how we go about it.
This is a really interesting topic on human rights. My question is that if there was one person you would want to clone who would it be? Would the rules still apply?
ReplyDeleteI feel like you missed the point of this blog post. I wouldn't want to clone anyone because if wouldn't be fair to the person I cloned or their genetic copy. I believe these rules apply to any situation where humans are being cloned
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete